
Most organizations operate with a dangerous binary when facing competitive threats: either everything is fine, or we’re in full crisis mode. This all-or-nothing approach creates two catastrophic failure modes that have destroyed more companies than bad strategy ever has.
The Data
The first failure mode is the slow boil. Threats get ignored until they’re catastrophic because the organization hasn’t reached the undefined threshold for “crisis.” Leaders say things like “let’s not overreact” and “we’ve always had competitors” while existential threats compound week after week. By the time the organization mobilizes, the window for effective response has closed.
The second is crisis fatigue. Organizations overreact to every competitive development, treating minor market noise with the same intensity as genuine existential threats. Teams burn out. Resources scatter across too many “urgent” priorities. When a real crisis arrives, the organization lacks the capacity and credibility to mobilize effectively. The boy has cried wolf too many times.
Framework Analysis
The solution isn’t better judgment about when to panic. The solution is a graduated response system that matches organizational intensity to actual threat level. This is exactly what elite technology companies have developed – and what both Google (in 2022) and OpenAI (in 2025) deployed when facing existential competitive threats.
The Code Red Playbook they adapted comes from a domain where calibrated emergency response has been refined over decades: hospital triage systems. Just as emergency rooms don’t treat a sprained ankle with the same urgency as a heart attack, organizations shouldn’t respond to competitive pressure with the same intensity as an existential threat.
Strategic Implications
The binary trap is particularly deadly because it feels like good management. Leaders who say “let’s not overreact” sound prudent. Leaders who escalate everything sound alarmist. Neither is serving the organization well.
Google stayed at “business as usual” for too long after ChatGPT launched because there was no intermediate state between normal operations and full crisis. OpenAI in 2025 faced the same challenge when Gemini 3 arrived. The organizations that survive paradigm shifts are those that have pre-built graduated response systems – with clear escalation criteria that remove the burden of judgment from crisis moments.
The Deeper Pattern
Calibration beats intuition in threat response. Organizations that rely on leadership “feel” for when to escalate will systematically fail – either too slow or too fast. The winners pre-define their response tiers and the evidence required to move between them.
Key Takeaway
The binary trap – business as usual versus full crisis – destroys organizations. Graduated response systems with explicit escalation criteria are the solution both Google and OpenAI deployed when survival was at stake.









