OpenAI’s Strategic Identity Crisis: The Bottom Line

OpenAI is trying to be everything to everyone — and in strategy, that’s a recipe for being nothing special to anyone.

The Unanswerable Questions

OpenAI cannot clearly answer fundamental questions about its identity:

  • Is it a consumer company? The 800M users and advertising push suggest yes. But enterprise clients distrust ad platforms.
  • Is it an enterprise company? The API business suggests yes. But market share is declining and consumer features dilute focus.
  • Is it a platform company? The agents and commerce plays suggest yes. But advertising poisons the trust required for commerce.
  • Is it a media company? Sora and Disney suggest yes. But video generation loses money on every render.
  • Is it an advertising company? The 630 ex-Meta hires suggest yes. But advertising undermines every other business line.

The Math Doesn’t Lie

  • Two proven engines must grow 7-10x while defending against focused competition
  • Three unproven engines must generate $55-95B from scratch in five years
  • Advertising actively undermines subscriptions AND enterprise — the two businesses that actually work
  • All five engines must fire perfectly to hit $200B
  • The $1.4 trillion in infrastructure commitments cannot be unwound

The Strategic Truth

The $200B target requires OpenAI to simultaneously be the best consumer company, the best enterprise company, the best developer platform, the best creator tool, AND the best advertising platform.

History suggests that’s not how strategy works. Companies win by being exceptional at one thing, not mediocre at five things.

In strategy, clarity beats scope. OpenAI has scope. Anthropic has clarity. The next five years will determine which approach prevails.


This is part of a comprehensive analysis. Read the full analysis on The Business Engineer.

Scroll to Top

Discover more from FourWeekMBA

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

FourWeekMBA