61% of Executives Will View AI as Assistant Within Three Years, MIT Sloan-BCG Research Shows

Chart showing how executives perceive AI roles today versus in three years
Source: MIT Sloan/BCG

New research from MIT Sloan and BCG reveals a decisive pattern in how executives perceive artificial intelligence: overwhelmingly as amplification, not replacement.

Today, 26% of executives view AI as an assistant. Within three years, that number jumps to 61%—a remarkable trajectory that reshapes how we should think about AI’s organizational role.

The Supportive Paradigm Dominates

The research categorizes AI relationships across a spectrum: assistant, coach, mentor, colleague, rival, and boss. The supportive roles—assistant, coach, mentor, colleague—all show dramatic expected growth in the three-year projection.

Meanwhile, “rival” and “boss” remain minority views even in forward-looking scenarios. Executives aren’t preparing for AI competition or AI authority—they’re preparing for AI collaboration.

Why This Pattern Matters

This finding challenges both utopian and dystopian AI narratives. The replacement thesis—that AI will systematically substitute for executive judgment—doesn’t match how actual decision-makers experience the technology.

Instead, the data suggests a second-order effect: AI amplifies existing executive capabilities rather than supplanting them. The “assistant” framing implies AI handles execution while humans retain judgment, context, and strategic direction.

Organizational Implications

For business strategy, this perception pattern has concrete implications:

  • Role design: Organizations should structure AI integration as capability enhancement, not headcount reduction
  • Investment focus: Tools that augment decision-making will see faster adoption than autonomous systems
  • Skill development: Executive training should emphasize AI collaboration rather than AI management

The shift from 26% to 61% “assistant” view also signals declining AI anxiety among leadership. As executives gain hands-on experience, abstract fears give way to practical integration.

The research suggests the future isn’t humans versus AI—it’s humans with AI, operating at amplified capacity across strategic and operational domains.

For deeper analysis of AI’s strategic implications, subscribe to The Business Engineer.

Scroll to Top

Discover more from FourWeekMBA

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

FourWeekMBA