UCP vs ACP vs Copilot: Head-to-Head Protocol Comparison for Agentic Commerce

This analysis is part of The AI Shopping Market Map 2026, a deep dive by The Business Engineer.

Protocol Comparison: UCP vs ACP vs Copilot
Source: The Business Engineer

Three protocols compete to define how AI agents interact with commerce. Here’s a head-to-head comparison across every critical dimension.

Scope

UCP (Google): Full journey—discovery, cart, checkout, support. ACP (OpenAI): Checkout only—focused on transaction completion. Copilot (Microsoft): Checkout + merchant AI assistants (Brand Agents).

Architecture

UCP: Open-source, any transport (REST/MCP/A2A), decentralized. ACP: Stripe infrastructure, delegated payment tokens, centralized via OpenAI. Copilot: Shopify integration, Brand Agent SDK, hybrid approach.

Monetization

UCP: Ads (Direct Offers at intent). ACP: Fees (transaction fee per purchase). Copilot: SaaS (enterprise subscriptions).

Key Strength

UCP: Billions of intent queries + open standard adoption = network effects. ACP: 810 million daily active users + conversational commerce dominance. Copilot: Enterprise relationships + B2B AI commerce.

The Real Question

It’s not about which protocol is “better”—it’s about distribution. UCP owns intent (search queries). ACP owns conversation (chat users). Copilot owns enterprise (B2B relationships). Merchants will support multiple protocols—just as they support multiple payment methods today.

Read the full analysis on The Business Engineer →

Scroll to Top

Discover more from FourWeekMBA

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

FourWeekMBA