The Packaging Paradox: Why Assembly Costs More Than the Chip Itself

The Packaging Paradox - CoWoS Bottleneck

Advanced packaging ($1,100) plus yield loss ($1,000) together exceed logic die fabrication ($900). The challenge isn’t making chips – it’s assembling them reliably. TSMC’s packaging capacity, not its fab capacity, is the binding constraint on AI chip production.

The CoWoS Bottleneck

TSMC’s Chip-on-Wafer-on-Substrate (CoWoS) packaging has been the real production bottleneck. CoWoS-L technology integrates a redistribution layer with a partial silicon interposer, enabling the stacking of more HBM around the GPU dies.

The process is extraordinarily complex: each B200 module contains two GPU dies plus multiple HBM stacks, all interconnected on a single substrate.

Capacity Constraints

Current CoWoS capacity: approximately 75,000 wafers per month in 2025, expanding to 95,000 by 2026 and 135,000 by 2027. But demand continues to outpace expansion.

Nvidia has secured over 70% of TSMC’s CoWoS-L capacity for 2025. Orders from Nvidia, AMD, Google, Amazon, and custom ASIC developers are “overflowing,” leaving TSMC with no spare capacity despite aggressive investment.

The Yield Tax

The $430-$1,700 range for packaging yield loss reveals manufacturing sensitivity. Bad yields can nearly double this cost component. Each failed package wastes not just packaging materials but the expensive GPU dies and HBM stacks that went into it.

This makes production economics highly sensitive to process maturity and quality control.

Key Takeaway

As lithography economics shows, semiconductor bottlenecks have shifted. The binding constraint isn’t leading-edge logic fabs – it’s the advanced packaging that assembles components into working systems.


Source: The Economics of the GPU on The Business Engineer

Scroll to Top

Discover more from FourWeekMBA

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

FourWeekMBA