
If the old stages (awareness, consideration, intent, purchase) collapse, what replaces them? The agentic funnel has its own stages, but they’re fundamentally different.
Stage 1: Agent Accessibility
Question: Can AI agents find and understand your products?
Before an AI can recommend you, it must be able to access your data. This requires:
- Structured data: Schema markup, JSON-LD, standardized product feeds
- Protocol integration: Connection to ACP, UCP, or equivalent checkout protocols
- Real-time feeds: Inventory, pricing, and availability updated hourly or faster
- API accessibility: Machine-readable interfaces that agents can query
Old equivalent: Being indexed by Google
New equivalent: Being parseable and actionable by AI agents
Failure mode: If your data isn’t structured and accessible, you’re invisible to agentic commerce—regardless of how good your products are.
Stage 2: Agent Consideration
Question: Does the AI include you in its evaluation set?
Accessibility isn’t enough. The AI evaluates potentially thousands of options before presenting recommendations. You need to make the cut.
This requires:
- Entity authority: Is your brand recognized and trusted by AI training data?
- Third-party signals: What do reviews, ratings, and external sources say about you?
- Relevance matching: Does your product data match the user’s stated needs?
- Competitive positioning: How do you compare on price, features, availability?
Old equivalent: SEO and content strategy to rank for keywords
New equivalent: Data quality and entity authority to rank in AI reasoning
Failure mode: The AI considers you but ranks you below competitors. You’re evaluated but not recommended.
Stage 3: Agent Recommendation
Question: Does the AI actually recommend you to the user?
This is the moment of truth. The AI has evaluated options and now presents 2-4 recommendations to the user. Are you one of them?
This depends on:
- Relevance to stated intent: How well do you match what the user asked for?
- Confidence level: How certain is the AI that you’ll satisfy the user?
- Trust signals: Does the AI trust your data, pricing, and availability?
- User context: Does the AI know this user prefers your brand or category?
Old equivalent: Appearing on page 1 of search results
New equivalent: Being in the AI’s top 3-4 recommendations
Failure mode: You’re considered but not recommended. The user never sees you.
Stage 4: Transaction Completion
Question: Can the user complete the purchase without leaving the AI?
Recommendation isn’t enough if the user has to leave the AI interface to buy. Friction returns, abandonment increases, and competitors with in-chat checkout win.
This requires:
- Checkout protocol integration: ACP, UCP, or equivalent enabled
- Payment processing: Seamless handoff to Stripe, Google Pay, PayPal, etc.
- Order management: Ability to confirm, track, and manage orders via the AI
- Return handling: Clear policies that the AI can communicate and execute
Old equivalent: Checkout optimization and cart recovery
New equivalent: Protocol integration that enables zero-friction purchase
Failure mode: User is recommended but has to “visit website” to buy. Conversion drops, competitors with instant checkout win.
Stage 5: Post-Purchase Relationship
Question: Does the AI maintain the relationship after purchase?
The agentic funnel doesn’t end at transaction. AI agents can manage ongoing relationships—tracking shipments, handling returns, suggesting replenishment, recommending accessories.
This requires:
- Order status integration: Real-time shipping and delivery data
- Support capabilities: AI can answer questions about the purchase
- Relationship data: Past purchases inform future recommendations
- Loyalty integration: Rewards, points, and preferences accessible to agents
Old equivalent: Email marketing and CRM
New equivalent: Persistent AI relationship management
Opportunity: Brands that enable rich post-purchase AI interactions build loyalty and repeat purchase in ways competitors cannot.
This is part of a comprehensive analysis. Read the full analysis on The Business Engineer.







