
Breakthrough innovations do not come from incremental improvements. They come from moonshots: ambitious, unreasonable attempts to solve massive problems with breakthrough technology. The moonshot discipline has a structure, and its logic is captured in this framework.
The full strategic foundations behind this framework are explored in The Business Engineer: https://businessengineer.ai/
1. Huge Problem — The Scale Threshold
A true moonshot must begin with a huge problem.
Not a workflow annoyance. Not an incremental efficiency issue.
A problem of global consequence.
Characteristics:
- Enormous scale
- Genuine societal relevance
- Clear economic or human impact
- Cannot be solved with marginal optimization
Examples of non-moonshot scale:
- “Improve support ticket resolution by 15 percent.”
- “Optimize customer service efficiency.”
These are operational improvements. They do not meet the scale threshold.
A deeper treatment of scale as a strategic variable appears in The Business Engineer: https://businessengineer.ai/
2. Radical Solution — The Paradigm Shift Requirement
A moonshot solution cannot be reasonable.
If it sounds reasonable, it is not a moonshot. This is the principle popularized inside Google’s X Moonshot Factory.
The solution must:
- fundamentally reframe the problem
- replace the status quo
- eliminate the problem, not improve it
- feel improbable, uncomfortable, or unreasonable
Examples of non-moonshot “solutions”:
- “Build a better chatbot for support tickets.”
- “Faster fraud detection with AI.”
These improve existing paradigms. They do not break them.
A detailed explanation of paradigm shifts and radicality is unpacked in The Business Engineer: https://businessengineer.ai/
3. Breakthrough Technology — The Glimmer of Hope
A moonshot is not magic.
It requires a technical pathway that did not exist before.
The technology does not need to be ready, but it must be plausible.
The glimmer of hope requires:
- evidence-based feasibility
- a new technical unlock
- a pathway created by scientific or engineering breakthroughs
Examples of missing breakthrough:
- “Let’s solve world hunger with current tech.”
- “Eliminate all disease with existing medicine.”
Without a technical unlock, ambition is just fantasy.
The technology threshold is detailed in The Business Engineer: https://businessengineer.ai/
The Filtering Mechanism — How to Test If Something Is a Moonshot
This framework uses a simple but strict filter:
- Does it solve a huge problem?
If not, stop. - Does the solution sound unreasonable?
If it sounds reasonable, it is incremental. - Is there a glimmer of technical hope?
If no, the idea fails the moonshot test.
If all three conditions pass, proceed to test.
This filter provides discipline.
It prevents teams from confusing ambition with breakthrough potential, a distinction explored further in The Business Engineer: https://businessengineer.ai/
True Moonshots — Real-World Examples
Built Environment (Anori)
- Huge: 25 percent of global waste and emissions
- Radical: Untangle development complexity for entire cities
- Tech: AI platform for coordination and real-time modeling
Autonomous Vehicles (Waymo)
- Huge: Transportation dominates GDP, safety, emissions
- Radical: Remove human drivers entirely
- Tech: Computer vision + ML + sensor fusion convergence
AI for Scientific Discovery
- Huge: Accelerating global knowledge creation
- Radical: AI autonomously proposes new hypotheses
- Tech: Foundation models + reasoning + simulation
These projects satisfy all three components.
They are examples of structured ambition rather than undisciplined optimism.
Moonshot case studies and analysis are expanded in The Business Engineer: https://businessengineer.ai/
Conclusion — How Leaders Should Use the Moonshot Framework
Most organizations default to:
- incremental improvement
- optimization
- risk minimization
This framework forces a different mindset.
It filters out incremental work and highlights true breakthrough opportunities.
A real moonshot requires:
- a problem big enough to matter
- a solution unreasonable enough to break the old paradigm
- a technology new enough to open a pathway that never existed
This is the structured foundation of breakthrough innovation.
For the deeper strategic reasoning behind the framework, see The Business Engineer:
https://businessengineer.ai/









