Over 2024-2025, Big Tech deployed $40+ billion through “license & acqui-hire” structures that achieve M&A outcomes while bypassing regulatory scrutiny.
The Deals
| Target | Acquirer | Deal Value | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| Character.AI | $2.7B | Founders to Google; company becomes “licensing shell” | |
| Inflection (Pi) | Microsoft | $650M | Suleyman becomes CEO of Microsoft AI; Pi absorbed into Copilot |
| Scale AI | Meta | $14.3B stake | Strategic investment |
Why This Structure Works
These structures achieve M&A outcomes (talent, IP, neutralizing competitors) while:
- Bypassing HSR filing requirements
- Avoiding FTC scrutiny
- Keeping the target “technically independent”
The DOJ is now investigating the Google-Character.AI deal as a potential de facto acquisition.
Impact on Ecosystem
The playbook creates “zombie startups”—companies hollowed of talent and innovation capacity but technically still operating.
Character.AI continues with new leadership but lost its founding team (Noam Shazeer and Daniel De Freitas—both original co-authors of the transformer architecture) and unique strategic advantage.
The Pattern
Consumer AI companions are proving difficult to build as independent businesses. The path to sustainability runs through Big Tech integration—either as acqui-hire target or as platform feature.
If you are building in this space, your durable strategy cannot rely on model quality alone.
This is part of a comprehensive analysis. Read the full analysis on The Business Engineer.








