From Token Economics to Action Economics: How Physical AI Changes AI Infrastructure

Jensen Huang’s CES 2026 framing shifted the AI economics conversation: AI factories don’t produce tokens—they produce actions.

Traditional AI Economics (LLMs)

Factor Value
Core Metric Cost per token
Workload Pattern Inference is lightweight vs. training
Scaling Formula Model parameters x Tokens generated
Inference Mode Batch, asynchronous (100ms+ acceptable)

Physical AI Economics

Factor Value
Core Metric Cost per successful action
Workload Pattern Training, simulation, AND inference run continuously
Scaling Formula (Parameters x Simulation fidelity x Action frequency) x Deployed robots
Inference Mode Real-time, continuous, safety-critical (sub-ms required)

The Infrastructure Cascade

  1. Edge chips become critical path: Jetson Thor (1 PFLOP) enables on-device humanoid reasoning. 542,000 robots x continuous inference = massive aggregate edge demand.
  2. Connectivity becomes non-negotiable: NVIDIA’s partnership with T-Mobile, Cisco for 6G. Robot fleets need industrial-grade networking.
  3. Data center topology shifts: Physical AI needs training + simulation + edge triangulation, not just centralized inference.

The Flywheel

Physical AI isn’t just a market for AI compute—it’s becoming the primary generator of grounded, physics-based training data that LLMs and agents need to move beyond pure language reasoning.


This analysis is part of a comprehensive report. Read the full analysis: Physical AI Is Crossing the Manufacturing Chasm on The Business Engineer.

Scroll to Top

Discover more from FourWeekMBA

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

FourWeekMBA