Apple didn’t choose Google — Apple settled for Google after being priced out of its preferred option.
The Deal
| Terms | Value |
|---|---|
| Annual Fee | $1 Billion |
| Model Size | 1.2T parameters |
| Trade-off | 5% reduction in Safari search query fees |
The Uncomfortable Reality
This is NOT choosing between excellent options.
This IS taking what it can get.
“Siri and today’s Apple Intelligence are at least two generations behind. Maybe worse.”
— John Gruber
Trading One Google Dependency for Another
| Old Dependency | New Dependency |
|---|---|
| Safari Search Fees (~$20B/year from Google) | Gemini AI Models ($1B/year to Google) |
Double Dependency: Search revenue + AI costs both flow to Google
The Bake-Off Context
- Google started training custom models for Apple’s servers
- Competed in head-to-head testing
- Offered acceptable (not aggressive) pricing
- Won by being available at the right price
Claude won, but Anthropic priced out. Gemini was the fallback.
What This Means for Apple
- 2x Double Dependency on single competitor
- -5% Revenue hit from Safari fee reduction
- No Differentiation — Same AI as Android
This is part of a comprehensive analysis. Read the full analysis on The Business Engineer.









