Apple is executing a Device-Layer Control Inversion — controlling where AI meets humans. But there’s a critical problem: Apple has not yet built an AI brain worthy of its hardware body.
The Uncomfortable Truth
Apple is considering using AI technology from Anthropic or OpenAI to power a new version of Siri, sidelining its own in-house models. This isn’t a partnership strategy. It’s a rescue operation.
Internal Evaluation Results
| Model | Performance |
|---|---|
| Apple Models | Underperformed |
| Claude (Anthropic) | Outperformed |
| ChatGPT (OpenAI) | Strong |
| Gemini (Google) | Strong |
“Third-party models — particularly Anthropic’s Claude — outperformed Apple’s tools at handling complex queries”
What This Means for Apple
- $34.5B R&D Can’t Compete — Despite massive investment, Apple’s models fail against competitors
- Vertical Integration Broken — The Apple way of controlling the full stack doesn’t work for AI
- Competitor Dependency — Now relying on Google for core intelligence in its products
- Brand Credibility at Risk — Siri updates promised in 2024, still undelivered in 2026
The Bottom Line
The company that prides itself on vertical integration → admitted its models couldn’t match external alternatives.
This is part of a comprehensive analysis. Read the full analysis on The Business Engineer.









