Traditional SaaS measures “stickiness” through switching costs: data migration difficulty, learning curves, contract lock-in. These are friction-based. Users want to leave but can’t.
Embedding operates on a fundamentally different mechanism.
You become the coordination layer that enables other systems to communicate. Removing you doesn’t just require migration — it requires re-architecting how everything connects.
The Critical Distinction:
| Dimension | Stickiness | Embedding |
|---|---|---|
| What users fight | Migration friction | Architectural complexity |
| Budget competition | Easier migration alternatives | “Rebuild entire integration” |
| Decision type | Product decision | Multi-year IT transformation |
| Timeline to switch | Quarters | Years |
The Paradox:
Sticky products generate constant competitive pressure because users are actively frustrated.
Embedded infrastructure often generates no competitive evaluation at all — not because users are satisfied, but because they’ve forgotten switching is conceptually possible.
This is part of a comprehensive analysis. Read the full analysis on The Business Engineer.









