Embedding vs. Stickiness: Why Embedded Infrastructure Stops Generating Competitive Evaluations Entirely

Traditional SaaS measures “stickiness” through switching costs: data migration difficulty, learning curves, contract lock-in. These are friction-based. Users want to leave but can’t.

Embedding vs. Stickiness

Embedding operates on a fundamentally different mechanism.

You become the coordination layer that enables other systems to communicate. Removing you doesn’t just require migration — it requires re-architecting how everything connects.

The Critical Distinction:

Dimension Stickiness Embedding
What users fight Migration friction Architectural complexity
Budget competition Easier migration alternatives “Rebuild entire integration”
Decision type Product decision Multi-year IT transformation
Timeline to switch Quarters Years

The Paradox:

Sticky products generate constant competitive pressure because users are actively frustrated.

Embedded infrastructure often generates no competitive evaluation at all — not because users are satisfied, but because they’ve forgotten switching is conceptually possible.


This is part of a comprehensive analysis. Read the full analysis on The Business Engineer.

Scroll to Top

Discover more from FourWeekMBA

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

FourWeekMBA