Economists Can’t Agree on AI’s Impact: From 0% to 30% Productivity Gains

How much will AI boost productivity? Economists’ estimates range from nearly nothing to 30%+ gains—a disagreement revealing fundamental uncertainty about AI’s economic impact.

Economists AI Productivity Disagreement
Source: Financial Times

The spread is unusually wide. For most technologies, economists converge on impact estimates within a few years of deployment. AI’s range remains enormous even as adoption accelerates, suggesting something fundamentally uncertain about how to measure AI’s effects.

Why the Disagreement

The pessimists argue: productivity gains require organizational change, not just technology. Most AI deployment augments rather than replaces; augmentation rarely produces step-change productivity. And measurement is hard—much AI value appears in quality improvements that GDP poorly captures.

The optimists counter: we’re in early deployment; gains compound as organizations learn to use AI effectively. The J-curve of technology adoption means initial measurement underestimates eventual impact.

The Investment Implication

Uncertainty this wide demands humility. Neither aggressive AI bets nor dismissive skepticism align with actual knowledge. The probabilistic approach: position for a range of outcomes rather than betting on a specific productivity scenario.

For economic analysis, visit The Business Engineer.

Scroll to Top

Discover more from FourWeekMBA

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

FourWeekMBA