Once you’ve identified your imbalance, design interventions that match your specific pattern. The wrong fix wastes effort.
Explorer-Heavy Organizations
Symptom: Many pilots, few in production
Intervention:
- Linking programs – pair each Explorer with an Automator from day one
- Graduation gates – clear criteria for when pilots move to production
- Explorer-Automator pairing for every initiative
- 13-week handoff cycles with defined milestones
Goal: Move ideas to production
Automator-Heavy Organizations
Symptom: Scaling efficiently, but missing new waves
Intervention:
- Mandated exploration time – 20% allocated to testing new approaches
- Quarterly model reviews to evaluate current stack
- Tech debt circuit breakers
- Innovation sabbaticals – rotate Automators into Explorer roles
Goal: Prevent stack calcification
Validator-Heavy Organizations
Symptom: Safe and compliant, but strategically stuck
Intervention:
- Risk-tiered governance – light touch for low-risk, full review for high
- Approval cycle caps – maximum 6 weeks for any decision
- Sandbox environments for experimentation
- “Safe to fail” experiments with pre-approved budgets
Goal: Unblock without risk
The intervention must match the imbalance. Wrong fix = wasted effort.
This is part of a comprehensive analysis. Read the full analysis on The Business Engineer.
More Resources
